Legal Opinion
Danara International, Ltd. v. United States Consumer Product Safety Commission
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided October 19, 1982No. 82-2844PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
LACEY, District Judge.
This is an application for a temporary restraining order by the plaintiff to restrain the defendant from publishing a certain press release. Because of the emergent nature of the matter, I am placing this opinion in the record.
Defendant, Consumer Product Safety Commission (“CPSC”), intends to distribute immediately a press release, the text of which is as follows:
“FOUR DAÑARA SQUEEZE TOYS MAY PRESENT CHOKING HAZARD TO INFANTS AND SMALL CHILDREN. WASHINGTON, D.C. — The Consumer Product Safety Commission today announced that its staff has made a preliminary determination…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Kershner v. MazurkiewiczCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Kennecott Corp. v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Continental Group, Inc. v. Amoco Chemicals Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Rennie v. KleinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dreamland Baby Co. v. Consumer Product Safety CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026