Legal Opinion
Hanrihan v. Parker
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 8, 1959PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCharles A. Loreto, J.
This is a motion by defendant MCA Artists, Ltd., pursuant to rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice, for an order dismissing the first cause of action pleaded against it on the ground that it is barred by the Statute of Limitations, and dismissing the second cause of action pleaded against it on the ground that the contract on which that cause of action is based is unenforcible under the Statute of Frauds.
In this action plaintiff sues two defendants, Shirley MacLaine Parker, known professionally as Shirley MacLaine, and MCA Artists, Ltd., the moving defendant.
Plaintiff alleges for his sole…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hornstein v. PodwitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Fogelson v. Rackfay Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1950
- Martocci v. Greater New York Brewery, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1950
- S. C. Posner Co. v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Hagan Corp. v. Medical SocietyNew York Supreme Court · 1950
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fury Imports, Inc. v. Shakespeare CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Piracci Construction Co. v. Skidmore, Owings & MerrillDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- Grissman v. Union Carbide Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- Spinap Corp. v. CafagnoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Hornady v. Plaza Realty Co., Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.