Legal Opinion
Rescue Army v. Municipal Court
California Supreme Court
Decided June 26, 1946No. L. A. 18946Published
1Opinion of the Court
28 Cal.2d 460 (1946)
THE RESCUE ARMY (a Corporation) et al., Petitioners,
v.
THE MUNICIPAL COURT OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Respondent.
L. A. No. 18946.
Supreme Court of California. In Bank.
June 26, 1946.
Robert H. Wallis for Petitioners.
Ray L. Chesebro, City Attorney, Donald M. Redwine, Assistant City Attorney, and John L. Bland, Deputy City Attorney, for Respondent.
Victor Ford Collins, Francis D. R. Moote and David Coleman as Amici Curiae on behalf of Respondent.
GIBSON, C.J.
Petitioners seek a writ of prohibition to restrain the Municipal Court of the City of Los Angeles from proceeding to try…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Haguer v. Committee for Industrial OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Prince v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Schneider v. State (Town of Irvington)Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.