Merrill v. Fahs
Supreme Court of the United States
1DissentJustice Reed
This case differs from Commissioner v. Wemyss, ante, p. 303. Whether the transferor of the sums paid for the release of dower and other marital rights, received ade*314quate and full consideration in money and money’s worth, is a question of fact. The agreement recites that the parties contemplate marriage and provides that the trust shall be set up only in the event of and following the marriage. Petitioner was obligated to create the trust upon consideration of the relinquishment of marital rights and did so, and hence this is not a case involving marriage alone as consideration. Through the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jones v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1943
- Ferguson v. DicksonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1924
- Henderson, Et Vir. v. UsherSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
- McCaughn v. CarverCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1927
- Stubblefield v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.