Legal Opinion

Kile v. City of Marietta

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 7, 1930No. 20652Published

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.

1. Where a proffered amendment to an affidavit of illegality, contains no averment under oath that the additional grounds set out therein were unknown to the affiant at the time of the filing of the original affidavit, the amendment is properly disallowed.. Civil Code (1910), § 5704; Georgia Northern Ry. Co. v. Cone, 17 Ga. App. 786 (4) (88 S. E. 701) ; Mosley v. Fryer, 102 Ga. 564 (27 S. E. 667) ; Binder v. Ragsdale, 100 Ga. 400 (28 S. E. 165) ; Baker v. Smith, 91 Ga. 143 (2) (16 S. E. 967).

2. Under the above-stated ruling and the facts of the instant case, the court did not err in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Baker v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  2. Binder v. RagsdaleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  3. Georgia Northern Railway Co. v. ConeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  4. Mosley v. Fryer & SonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API