Legal Opinion · Dissent

Estate of James U. Thompson, Deceased Susan T. Taylor, Personal Representative v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided January 3, 1989No. 88-3981Published

1DissentWilkinson, Circuit Judge

As to the general purposes of I.R.C. § 2032A, I have no quarrel with the majority. Congress clearly intended that the family farm not be encumbered by a federal estate tax calculated on the farm property’s fair market value. The question here, however, is what method of valuation Congress intended when the family farm no longer retains its family character. The majority would apply favorable tax treatment under § 2032A even when a part of the family farm is left in the form of a beneficial or income interest to non-family members.

I disagree. I do so, however, with an appreciation for the fact…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Ruben W. Mangels, Administrator of the Estate of Luella R. Mangels, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  3. Robert Whalen, of the Estate of Katherine B. Whalen, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  4. In The Matter Of Israel-British Bank (London) LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API