Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Stack

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 4, 1989No. 88-1299PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

After the remand of this cause pursuant to Stack v. State Farm Mutual Ins. Co., 507 So.2d 617 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), review denied, 515 So.2d 230 (Fla.1987), in which we held that the insureds were covered by their State Farm uninsured motorist policy and ordered arbitration to determine whether they were entitled to recover, Stack, 507 So.2d at 620, the trial court entered a judgment for attorney’s fees for the Stacks pursuant to section 627.428, Florida Statutes (1987). State Farm now appeals from that order1 contending, for two reasons, that the award of attorney’s fees…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. RoweSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. v. AndersonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  3. Mendelson v. MendelsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  4. Travelers Ins. Co. v. HortonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  5. Dixie Farms, Inc. v. Hertz Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Moore v. Allstate Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1990
  2. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. CedoliaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  3. Gil v. MendelsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  4. Moore v. Allstate Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  5. Sierra v. Allstate Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API