Inquiry Concerning Complaint Of: Judicial Standards Commission v. Leroy Not Afraid
Montana Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Nelson
¶28 I agree with the Court that the complaint against Not Afraid must be dismissed, but I strongly disagree with the Court’s rationale.
I. Jurisdiction
|¶29 The most fundamental problem with this case is evident from its (caption: Inquiry Concerning Complaint of: Judicial Standards ICommission v. Leroy Not Afraid. While the Court correctly observes Sthat questions of jurisdiction may be raised at any time, Opinion, P 10-indeed, courts have an ‘independent obligation” to determine Ivhether jurisdiction exists, even in the absence of a challenge from bny party, see Stanley v. Lemire, 2006 MT 304,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Bostain v. Food Exp., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
- State Ex Rel. Barney v. HawkinsMontana Supreme Court · 1927
- Stanley v. LemireMontana Supreme Court · 2006
- Montana Petroleum Tank Release Compensation Board v. Crumleys, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2008
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.