Legal Opinion

In Re Petition of Miller

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 30, 1969No. Docket 5,509PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.

The petitioner, Florence Miller, appeals from an accelerated judgment denying her petition filed pursuant to §§ 59-66 of the plat aet of 1929 1 for the vacation of a street and alleys in Double Super. Highways Subdivision No 1, Waterford Township, Oakland County, Michigan. The trial judge ruled that the street and alleys are county roads under the jurisdiction and control of the board of county road commissioners of Oakland county and that the circuit court, therefore, lacks power to vacate them. We agree with his determination and affirm.

If the street and alleys sought to be vacated are in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re Petition of BryantMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Hooker v. BondMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Fay v. WoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  4. In Re Petition of WernickeMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  5. W. R. Reynolds & Co. v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ambs v. Kalamazoo County Road CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Conlon v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. VanStock v. BANGOR TOWNSHIPMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. VanStock v. BANGOR TOWNSHIPMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API