Legal Opinion

Ampatis v. Compania Maritima Samsoc Ltda.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 1, 1950PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

IRVING R. KAUFMAN, District Judge.

Th,e respondent, Compania Marítima Samsoc Ltda., S.A. has excepted to the libel on the following grounds:

1. That the libelant, Ampatis, is not authorized under the Admiralty Rules to maintain this action on behalf of the other libelants named in the libel.

2. That the libelant, Ampatis, has no authority to act on behalf of the other libelants named in the libel and these libel-ants have not authorized him or his proctors to institute this action on their behalf.

3. That this court does not have the power or jurisdiction to compel the libelants named to become…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Oliver v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  2. Wahlborg v. American S. S. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1938

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Totolos v. Compania de Navegacion Cristobal, S. A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API