Legal Opinion

Hammett v. New Orleans Diamond & Jewelry Wholesalers, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 30, 1991No. 90-CA-1226PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CIACCIO, Judge.

Plaintiffs, Donald and Carey Hammett, filed suit against New Orleans Diamond and Jewelry Wholesalers, Inc. and United Parcel Service, Inc. (U.P.S.) for damages caused when plaintiffs’ jewelry was lost during shipment. U.P.S. was dismissed from the suit on motion for summary judgment, and following a trial on the merits, the trial court granted judgment in favor of defendant, New Orleans Diamond, dismissing plaintiffs’ suit. Plaintiffs appealed this judgment, claiming that the trial court erred in four ways: 1) in not finding New Orleans Diamond and U.P.S. liable in solido for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Langendorf v. Administrators of Tulane Ed. FundLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
  2. Home Insurance Co. v. Southern Specialty Sales Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. Mercer v. Columbia Equipment Co., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
  4. Freeman v. GarciaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1986

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hammett v. New Orleans Diamond & Jewelry Wholesalers, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API