Legal Opinion

McKinney v. Nayberger

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1931Published

1Opinion

Petition for rehearing denied December 22, 1931

On Petition for Rehearing

(6 P. (2d) 228)

ROSSMAN, J.

The excellent argument advanced in respondents’ brief, accompanying their petition for a rehearing, has caused us once more to give extended consideration to this cause. We are persuaded, however, that the statement of our conclusions should be brief. Two contentions are pressed upon us: (1) that in the absence of an allegation in the complaint ¿verring that the suit wherein the receiver was appointed was prompted by malice and lacked probable cause, no cause of action was stated; (2) that the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. District Court of Eighth Jud. Dist.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1925
  2. American Freehold Land Mortgage Co. of London v. TurnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  3. Joseph Dry Goods Co. v. HechtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1903
  4. Mitchell v. Silver Lake LodgeOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  5. McKinney v. NaybergerOregon Supreme Court · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API