Legal Opinion

McFadden v. Allen-Nelson Mill Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1928No. 21143. En BancPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

This action was originally instituted against Alien-Nelson Mill Co., a corporation, which answered under the name of Bratnober Company, a corporation, to which name the former corporation had been changed. The action is to quiet title to a tract of forty acres of land in King county, Washington, and the standing timber thereon.

On July 24, 1906, Julius Rubow, the then owner of the land, made a contract with Alien-Nelson Mill Company, designated a “timber contract,” conveying to the mill company the timber and the right to take it off within a period of five years, “without let or hindrance.”

A…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bunch v. Elizabeth City Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  2. Butler v. Supreme CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Raynor v. Scandinavian-American BankWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  4. McNair & Wade Land Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1907
  5. Hendrickson v. LyonsWashington Supreme Court · 1922

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Elmonte Investment Co. v. Schafer Bros. Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Miller v. SyboutsWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Commonwealth v. GomesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
  4. Nelson v. McKinneyWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Auve v. WenzlaffWashington Supreme Court · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API