Legal Opinion
Eichelberger v. Brueckheimer
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 17, 1993No. 93-00215PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
613 So.2d 1372 (1993)
Robert Lee EICHELBERGER, Petitioner,
v.
Deborah K. BRUECKHEIMER, Chief Assistant Public Defender, Tenth Judicial Circuit, Respondent.
No. 93-00215.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
February 17, 1993.
Robert Lee Eichelberger, pro se.
2Per curiam
Robert Eichelberger seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the respondent to answer his correspondence. Respondent is the Chief Assistant Public Defender in charge of non-capital appeals for the Tenth Judicial Circuit.
Of primary concern to Eichelberger is a letter dated December 7, 1992, allegedly unanswered, in which he registers a…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Buckwalter v. City of LakelandSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
- Thompson v. UnterbergerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- City of Miami Beach v. Mr. Samuel's, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1977
- McCuiston v. WanickaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
4Cited by13 opinions
- Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Pearce v. SheffeyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Chancey v. ChanceyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Colon v. IrwinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Brown v. Ameri Star, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.