Legal Opinion

City of St. Louis ex rel. Lohrum v. Coons

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1865PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. The petition alleges, 1. That the defendant is the owner and in possession of a certain lot particularly described. 2. That the City of St. Louis, by authority of ordinance 4517, (not set out nor described or cited in any way,) contracted with said Lohrum for the macadamizing of a street, for the improvement of said street, in front of and adjoining defendant’s property. 3. That said Lohrum performed said work in a skillful manner in…

Read the full summary

Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. The petition alleges, 1. That the defendant is the owner and in possession of a certain lot particularly described. 2. That the City of St. Louis, by authority of ordinance 4517, (not set out nor described or cited in any way,) contracted with said Lohrum for the macadamizing of a street, for the improvement of said street, in front of and adjoining defendant’s property. 3. That said Lohrum performed said work in a skillful manner in accordance with his contract. 4. That said work, under laws then existing, was chargeable to the property adjoining and in…

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, Judge

The petition which was filed in the St. Louis Circuit Court on the first day of August, 1860, appears to have stated all the facts which were necessary to constitute a cause of action against the defendant, founded upon the special tax bill. The answer specifically denied all the material allegations. The plaintiffs proved that the city engineer had charge of all work of the kind specified in the certified tax bill. He then read the certified bill in evidence, the defence, and excepting, and closed his case. The defendant asked the court to instruct the jury to find for the defendant. The…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of St. Louis ex rel. Seibert v. AllenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  2. Buchan v. BroadwellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885
  3. Stifel v. DoughertyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1879
  4. City of St. Louis v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Missouri · 1866
  5. Hammett v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API