Legal Opinion · Dissent

Missouri v. Jenkins

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 12, 1995No. 93-1823Published

1Dissent

Justice Souter, with whom Justice Stevens, Justice Ginsburg, and Justice Breyer join,

dissenting.

The Court’s process of orderly adjudication has broken down in this case. The Court disposes of challenges to only two of the District Court’s many discrete remedial orders by declaring that the District Court erroneously provided an interdistrict remedy for an intradistrict violation. In doing so, it resolves a foundational issue going to one element of the District Court’s decree that we did not accept for review in this case, that we need not reach in order to answer the questions that we did…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Branti v. FinkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Green v. County School Board of New Kent CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Milliken v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1977

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API