Legal Opinion

Slay v. Milton

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1885No. Case No. 5036PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Coryell. Tried below before the Hon. T. L. Nugent. On the 19th of October, 1882, appellant, as landlord of appellee, sued out a distress warrant against him before a justice of the peace of Coryell county. Appellant claimed $625 for advances made to his tenant to enable him to make the crop, and also the rent of twenty-three acres of cotton and ten acres of corn, at one-fourth of the crop raised.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Coryell. Tried below before the Hon. T. L. Nugent. On the 19th of October, 1882, appellant, as landlord of appellee, sued out a distress warrant against him before a justice of the peace of Coryell county. Appellant claimed $625 for advances made to his tenant to enable him to make the crop, and also the rent of twenty-three acres of cotton and ten acres of corn, at one-fourth of the crop raised. In these proceedings plaintiff gave the required bond and made affidavit therefor and procured the issuance of a distress warrant, which was, on October 20, 1882, levied on seventy acres…

1Opinion of the Court

Delany, J. Com. App.

When the defendant brought forward his plea in reconvention, claiming damages for the wrongful issuance of the distress warrant, the plaintiff excepted to it on the ground that such a plea was inadmissible in this action. He insisted below, and he contends in this court, that the defendant’s sole remedy for damages was upon the land, and that he could not be heard upon that until after the termination of the present suit. And he refers us to article 3113, R. S., which, after providing for the bond to be given by the plaintiff in the case, concludes with these words: “…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Doan v. Transcanada Keystone Pipeline, LPCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018
  2. Mumme v. SpiesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API