Legal Opinion

Barowski v. Schulz

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1901PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee county: Lawrence W. Halsey, Circuit Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtCassoday, C. J.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff while in the building of the defendants. The defendants demurred on the *416ground that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to-constitute a cause of action. This is an appeal from, the order overruling such demurrer.

The complaint’ is to the effect that August 18, 1899, the defendants were copartners in business and the owners and in possession of the building and premises described, wherein they carried on the business of manufacturing paper boxes that on that day the plaintiff was lawfully, and at the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Beck v. . CarterNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Parker v. Portland Publishing Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1879
  3. Carpenter v. Town of RollingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Boltz v. Town of SullivanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Peake v. BuellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lehman v. Amsterdam Coffee Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Prince v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1960
  3. Schoenfeldt v. BabcockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API