Legal Opinion

United States v. Castro-Ward

United States District Court

Decided August 13, 2018No. Criminal No. 18-412 (FAB)Published

1Opinion of the Court

FRANCISCO A. BESOSA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

*157Before the Court are defendant Lara Castro-Ward ("Castro")'s third and fourth motions to compel disclosure of documentary, photographic and video evidence pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 17 (" Rule 17"). (Docket Nos. 32 and 38.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Castro's third and fourth motions to compel.

I. Background

Castro purportedly attempted to provide contraband, consisting of cellular phones, to inmates at the Metropolitan Detention Center ("MDC") in Guaynabo, Puerto Rico on July 30, 2016. (Docket No. 3.)…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Bowman Dairy Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. United States v. Cuthbertson, Gerald M. Appeal of Cbs Inc., Third Party WitnessCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API