Legal Opinion
Hobbs v. Genesys Technology N.V.
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided July 8, 2025No. 3:23-cv-00413Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION DEBORAH HOBBS, on behalf of herself ) and all others similarly situated, ) ) Civil Action No. 3:23-CV-413-CHB Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) MEMORANDUM ORDER AND ) OPINION GENESYS TECHNOLOGY N.V., d/b/a ) Jumba Bet, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) *** *** *** *** This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Deborah Hobbs’s Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint, [R. 36], and her Response to Order to Show Cause, [R. 38]. On April 14, 2025, the Court ordered Hobbs to “file either (1) an apt motion (reflective of case status), or (2) a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Deposit Guaranty National Bank v. RoperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Jeffrey Parchman v. SLM Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- Wilbur Macy v. GC Services Ltd. P'shipCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.