Legal Opinion
Erma Stites v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 1, 1992No. 90-56164PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The panel has voted unanimously to amend the opinion previously issued in this case. The opinion filed April 1, 1992, 960 F.2d 864, is amended as follows:
[Editor’s Note: Opinion amended for publication]
With that amendment, the panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing and reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc.
The full court has been advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc, and of the proposed amendment to the opinion, and no judge of the court has requested a vote to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App.P. 35.
The petition for rehearing is hereby denied and the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sylvia A. Sliwa v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Stebco Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Carlos Zuluaga v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Linda Marie Nichols v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- James J. Randazzo v. United States of America, Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Erma Stites v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Simuro v. SheddDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2016
- (HC) Garrett v. MooreDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- (HC) Russ v. PriceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
- Bond v. BrownDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2024
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.