Legal Opinion

Acosta v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 20, 2005PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment of the Court of Claims of the State of New York (S. Michael Nadel, J.), entered on or about October 26, 2004, after a nonjury trial, dismissing the claim to recover for unjust conviction and imprisonment pursuant to the Unjust Conviction and Imprisonment Act of 1984 (Court of Claims Act § 8-b), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

*368The trial court’s conclusion that claimant failed to present sufficient evidence to meet his heavy burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that he did not commit the crimes with which he was charged in the underlying prosecution (see Court of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Reed v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Taran v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Groce v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. Alexandre v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1991

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Taylor v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API