Legal Opinion

Coreil v. Vidrine

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 8, 1936No. 1595PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OTT, Judge.

The suit is by executory process to foreclose a mortgage on certain land and improvements in the town of Ville Platte, the balance due on the mortgage being the sum of $1,249, plus interest and attorneys’ fees. The order for executory process was signed by the judge on December 10, 1935. On December 12, 1935, defendant obtained an order of appeal from the judgment and filed a bond for a suspensive appeal on the same day.

The only issue on appeal from an order of executory process is whether or not the authentic evidence justified the issuance of the writ. It is urged in this case…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commercial Credit Co. v. Melba Candy Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1926
  2. Terrel v. FergusonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1926
  3. Citizens' Bank of Louisiana v. CrooksSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1869

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Coreil v. VidrineLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API