Legal Opinion

Bugg v. Meredith

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 18, 1926No. 6 Div. 618PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, C. J.

It may be conceded that the plaintiff made out a prima facie case; yet, if the evidence of the engineer was true, the defendant was entitled to the general charge. It may also be conceded that-the evidence of some of the witnesses, as to the tracks, was sufficient to afford an inference that it was untrue, so as to prevent the general charge for the defendant; still it was at least entitled to have its defense, with the hypothesis,' submitted to the jury as embodied in refused charge 6. Central of Ga. R. R. v. Brister, 40 So. 512, 145 Ala. 432; Central of Ga. R. Co. v. Pittman, 80 So. 141, 16…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Central of Ga. Ry. Co. v. BristerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  2. Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. PittmanAlabama Court of Appeals · 1918

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bugg v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  2. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company v. SelfCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API