Legal Opinion

Snider v. Snider

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 2015No. 7055 S-15613PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MAASSEN, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

A father filed for divoree and sought sole physical custody of the couple's only child. Shortly before trial the father moved for a continuance. The court vacated the first scheduled trial day, used the second to take testimony from out-of-state witnesses, then continued taking evidence a few days later. Partway through that day's proceedings the court informed the parties it was their last opportunity to present evidence. 'The father objected, and in post-trial pleadings he presented the affidavit testimony of two other witnesses he had intended to…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Miller v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Aransas Project v. Bryan ShawCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
  4. Vachon v. PuglieseAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Ebertz v. EbertzAlaska Supreme Court · 2005

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sharon Thompson v. Everett ThompsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Pederson v. Arctic Slope Regional CorporationAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Burns-Marshall v. KrogmanAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  4. ITMO Protective Proceedings of Macon J.Alaska Supreme Court · 2025
  5. Lydia May f/k/a Lydia Petersen v. Jon-Marc PetersenAlaska Supreme Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API