Legal Opinion

Michael Earitt White v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided July 28, 2014No. 06-13-00110-CRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Order by

Chief Justice MORRISS.

After Michael Earitt White was convicted of driving while his license was suspended, the trial court held indigency hearings to determine whether White was entitled to a free record and an appointed lawyer on appeal. The sole direct testimony as to White’s indigency came from White. The State’s only evidence that attempted to rebut White’s evidence was proof that, on two prior occasions, White posted bonds of $10,000.00 and $1,000.00. The trial court ruled that White was not indigent and was, thus, not entitled to have (1) court-appointed counsel to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Whitehead v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
  2. Snoke v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  3. Skidmore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Denetra Marie Harris v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2015
  2. Burns Giles Miller v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2018
  3. Michael Earitt White v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API