Legal Opinion

Monroe Greyhound Ass'n v. Quigley

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 1927PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

This injunction must be vacated because power to continue it does not rest with the court.

It is a general rule that injunction will not issue to stay criminal or quasi criminal proceedings, whether the prosecution is for the violation of a statute or an ordinance. Even though complainants were indicted under a void statute, a court of equity could not interfere, this extraordinary relief by injunction against the prosecution of a crime being only available where there is no other remedy and the courts holding that trial by jury, habeas corpus, motion and plea are abundant safeguards in such…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Truax v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. In Re SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Davis v. American Society for Prevention of Cruelty to AnimalsNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  4. Biddles, Inc. v. EnrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  5. Buffalo Gravel Corp. v. MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. D & W, INC. v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. Brandenburg v. Court of General Sessions of New York CountyNew York Supreme Court · 1947
  3. State Ex Rel. Freebourn v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API