Pruitt v. Pruitt
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
David Newbern, Judge.
The question we find to be controlling here is whether the appellant’s amended complaint against the appellee, Elbert T. Pruitt, stated a claim which was barred by the statute of limitations. We agree with the chancellor that, if a claim was stated by the amended complaint, it was barred. We also agree with the chancellor that there was no showing of the negligence alleged against the appellee John Matthew Co., and thus we affirm the judgment favoring all of the appellees.
Barbara and Elbert Pruitt were divorced in 1970. Before their divorce, they had contracted to buy a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Burton v. TribbleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
- Field v. Gazette Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
- Bridgman v. DrillingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
- Davis v. ChrispSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
- Williams v. PurdySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.