Legal Opinion

Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. Stewart

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 31, 1898PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Trespass on the Case, for personal injuries. Trial in the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Philip Stein, Judge, presiding. "Verdict and judgment for plaintiff. Appeal by defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Freeman

There is such a radical conflict of testimony in this case that no good purpose can be subserved by its discussion. The questions of fact were presented to the jury, and if the latter were clearly and'properly instructed, and no material errors occurred in the rulings of the Superior Court upon the trial, the verdict of the jury, if uninfluenced by passion or prejudice, should not' be disturbed,-even though if sitting as jurors, we might have reached a different -conclusion.

It is urged by appellee that the Superior Court erred in refusing to permit the company’s counsel to recall two of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Cicero & Proviso Street Railway Co. v. MeixnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Moreland v. Boston & Providence RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
  4. Toledo, Wabash & Western Railway Co. v. GrushIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Spannagle v. Chicago & Alton RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1889

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. WeeksAppellate Court of Illinois · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API