Massell v. Fourth National Bank
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion
ON MOTION ROB REHEARING.
Bell, J.
The motion for rehearing is aimed at the ruling in the first headnote and in the corresponding division of the opinion. It is apparent that counsel for movant, the plaintiff in error, *608have construed our decision as holding that the authority of Medlin as assistant manager, to indorse the instruments in behalf of the corporation, should be -inferred from the mere fact that he had drawn them in the first instance, the defendant by acceptance being committed to his authority to draw them. It is urged “that where an agent or officer of a corporation is authorized…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Raleigh & Gaston Railroad v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Exchange Bank v. ThrowerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Bennett v. PotashnickMissouri Court of Appeals · 1924
- Dobbins v. Etowah Manufacturing, Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1886
- Northwestern Savings Bank v. International BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1901
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.