Legal Opinion

Nichoson v. Erickson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1909No. 8507PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from an order of the superior' court for Benton county, Canfield, J., entered July 13, 1909, denying a motion to dissolve an attachment, after a hearing before the court.

1Opinion of the CourtDunbae, J.

This action was brought to recover the sum of $1,084.86, alleged to be due for goods sold and delivered by the plaintiffs to defendants. The writ of attachment issued and was served upon defendant Erickson, and certain property taken. A writ was also issued to the sheriff of Franklin county, which was served upon defendant Lawrence. Defendant Erickson moved to dissolve this attachment, and a hearing was had and the motion was finally denied. The grounds for attachment are set forth as follows, after stating the amount claimed to be due:

“The defendants are about to convert their property into…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bender v. RinkerWashington Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hall v. RaettigWashington Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API