Legal Opinion

Pierce v. Cobb

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 5, 1913PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal by plaintiffs from Bragcm, Jat tbe November Term, 1912, of Pitt.

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

This action was brought to recover the amount of two notes under seal, dated 1 April, 1911, one for the sum of $500 due 10 June, 1911, and the other for $1,000 due-15 October, 1911, with interest after maturity. The notes were payable to *301C. C. Pierce and F. C. Harding, attorneys of Mrs. Rutb Cobb, plaintiffs, and were signed by B. P. and J. H. Cobb, defendants. On the back of the notes, at the time they were executed, was the following: “It is fully understood and agreed that this note shall not become due nor collectible in any event until Mrs. Ruth Cobb shall have obtained from her husband,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Evans v. Freeman.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Walker v. . VentersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  3. Moffitt v. . ManessSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  4. Cobb v. Clegg.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  5. Archbell v. ArchbellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Exum v. LynchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  2. Archbell v. . ArchbellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  3. National Bank v. WinslowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  4. Exum v. . LynchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  5. Martin v. . Mask.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1912

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API