Legal Opinion
Raskin v. CyNet, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided February 15, 2001No. Civ.A. H-00-2356PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HITTNER, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are Plaintiffs Motion to Remand and Plaintiffs Supplemental Motion to Remand. Having considered the motions, submissions, and applicable law, the Court determines that the motions to remand should be granted.
I. Background
Defendant CyNet, Inc. (“CyNet”) hired Plaintiff Philip Raskin (“Raskin”) in March 1998. On April 20,1998, Raskin and CyN-et entered into a written stock option agreement (“the agreement”). 1 It provided, in pertinent part:
You are hereby granted as a key employee of CyNet, Inc. (the “Company”), an option to purchase 15,000…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Memorial Hospital System v. Northbrook Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Donald J. Willy, and George A. Young v. The Coastal Corp., Coastal States Management Co., Inc., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- McClelland v. GronwaldtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Donovan v. DillinghamCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Oatway v. American International Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Miller v. PPG Industries, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2002
- Allstate Insurance v. QuickDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2002
- Oatway v. American International Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- THE COBB FOUNDATION INC v. HART COUNTY GEORGIADistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2024