Forsyth v. Ganson
New York Supreme Court
This was an action of assumpsit, tried at the Livingston circuit in May, 1828, before the Hon. John Birdsall, then one of the circuit judges. The action was brought for the support and maintenance of Esther Ganson, the mother of the plaintiff, and the step mother of the intestate.
Read the full summary
This was an action of assumpsit, tried at the Livingston circuit in May, 1828, before the Hon. John Birdsall, then one of the circuit judges. The action was brought for the support and maintenance of Esther Ganson, the mother of the plaintiff, and the step mother of the intestate. It appeared when the father of the intestate married Esther Ganson, she was possessed of propetty to some considerable amount; in 1804, the father of the intestate bought a place and went into the business of tavern keeping; his sons, John the intestate and James the administrator, lived with him after they arrived…
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court,
Sutherland, J.
If the plaintiff can recover at all, it must be on the ground that the intestate, John Ganson, was legally bound to support his step mother, Esther Ganson, and that having refused to provide for her, the law implies a promise on his part to pay (he plaintiff whatever he has necessarily expended in her support. There is no evidence, either of a request on the part of the intestate to the plaintiff to provide for Esther Ganson, or of any express promise to pay him for supporting her. The jury, by their verdict, have found that .the intestate either had funds in his…
2Cited by19 opinions
- Caruthers v. Mardis' adm'rsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1842
- La Bau v. VanderbiltNew York Surrogate's Court · 1879
- Lane v. DotyNew York Supreme Court · 1848
- Scruggs v. Driver's ExecutorsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1857
- Inhabitants of Biddeford v. BenoitSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1929
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.