Legal Opinion

Whitney v. Pinney

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 17, 1892PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, Edwin C. Whitney, from an order of the District Court of Hennepin County, Hicks, J., made March 18, 1892, refusing a new trial. The plaintiff, Edwin C. Whitney, is the assignee of a judgment recovered August 25, 1888, by Samuel Hill, against Winthrop Young, as administrator of the estate of Ovid Pinney, deceased.

Read the full summary

Appeal by the plaintiff, Edwin C. Whitney, from an order of the District Court of Hennepin County, Hicks, J., made March 18, 1892, refusing a new trial. The plaintiff, Edwin C. Whitney, is the assignee of a judgment recovered August 25, 1888, by Samuel Hill, against Winthrop Young, as administrator of the estate of Ovid Pinney, deceased. Whitney brought this action against Winthrop Young, and against Polly Pinney, Hariett Lonergan, O. P. Buel and others, heirs and next of kin of Ovid Pinney, deceased, seeking to recover from Young personally, and from the heirs and next of kin, a balance of…

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

The respondent in this action, defendant Young, became the administrator, with the will annexed, of the estate of Ovid Pinney, deceased, January 25, 1881. October 15, 1883, on his own application therefor, the proper court examined and allowed his final account, and made its final decree, assigning and distributing the balance of the estate remaining in his hands, and he duly complied with the provisions of said decree by transferring and distributing all of the property to the persons thereto entitled as devisees and legatees. 'Since that time said defendant Young has not been possessed of…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Austin v. . MunroNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Rathbone v. . HooneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. Landon v. . TownshendNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  4. Fern v. LeutholdSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  5. Yarrington v. RobinsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of KoffelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  2. Coughlin v. WinemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  3. McClure v. AdamsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nebraska · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API