Legal Opinion

All-State Supply, Inc. v. Fisher

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 3, 1972No. 5-5966PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lyle Brown, Justice.

Appellant All-State Supply, Inc., sought to enforce the provisions of an employment contract between it and appellee, Alva Claude Fisher. That contract prohibited Fisher from accepting any employment with any competing firm for a designated period. The trial court denied relief and All-State appeals. The single point for reversal is: “The restrictions imposed in clause twelve of the parties’ contract as to time and space and the sum stated as liquidated damages were reasonable and necessary for the protection of a legitimate business interest of appellant and should be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McLeod v. MeyerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  2. Orkin Exterminating Co. v. MurrellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  3. Borden, Inc. v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Rector-Phillips-Morse, Inc. v. VromanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  2. Surgidev Corp. v. Eye Technology, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1986
  3. Duffner v. AlbertyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1986
  4. Stuart C. Irby Company, Inc. v. Brandon TiptonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
  5. Jaraki v. Cardiology Associates of Northeast Arkansas, P.A.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API