Legal Opinion

In Re Will of Montgomery

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 15, 1960No. 268PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarney, J.

The proponent, appellant here, sought to have a lost will admitted to probate. At the close of all of the evidence the county court ruled that the proponent had failed to sustain the burden of proof that this instrument was the will of Clara Belle Montgomery and in full force and effect, unrevoked, at her death. A verdict was directed in favor of the contestants, appellees here, to which ruling the proponent excepted. This exception constitutes the sole ground of his appeal.

Ever since Minkler v. Minkler’s Estate, 14 Vt. 125, it has been the law of this state that the absence, at the death of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Perkins v. Vermont Hydro-Electric Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1934
  2. Watkins v. WatkinsMississippi Supreme Court · 1926
  3. State v. TatkoSupreme Court of Vermont · 1957
  4. Benoit v. MarvinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1958
  5. Lyons v. BloodworthSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fuller v. City of RutlandSupreme Court of Vermont · 1961
  2. Succession of TalbotSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1988
  3. Condosta v. CondostaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API