City of New York v. . Charles Steen, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal in each of the above-entitled actions, by permission, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered January 7, 1921, which affirmed a determination of the Appellate Term affirming a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York in favor of plaintiff.
Read the full summary
Appeal in each of the above-entitled actions, by permission, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered January 7, 1921, which affirmed a determination of the Appellate Term affirming a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York in favor of plaintiff. Both actions were to recover penalties for alleged violations of sections 13 and 22 of article 2 of chapter 26 of the Code of Ordinances of the city of New York. In both cases it appeared that while the scales were correct the salesman had attempted to collect more than…
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment in each case affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.
2Cited by2 opinions
- People v. . ViscontiNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- City of New York v. Dairylea Cooperative, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1973