Clow v. BOARD OF CTY. COM'RS OF PAYETTE COUNTY
Idaho Supreme Court
1Dissent
BISTLINE, Justice,
dissenting from opinion of October 5, 1983, and dissenting from denial of petition for rehearing.
The petition for rehearing should be granted. As forecast in my opinion of October 5,1983, and as made abundantly clear by the petition for rehearing, the majority opinion of October 5 did duck the issues decided by the trial court and raised on the appeal.
Compounding such error in appellate jurisprudence, the majority now avoids the issue squarely presented on the petition for rehearing. The parties did stipulate to the procedure, which was followed. The majority’s view is that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lomas & Nettleton Co. v. Tiger Enterprises, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1978
- McNeil v. GislerIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
- Houska v. HouskaIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
- Yellowpine Water User's Ass'n v. ImelIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
- Chugg v. ChuggIdaho Supreme Court · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.