Legal Opinion

Dickson v. Valentine

The Superior Court of New York City

Decided June 28, 1889Published

Appeal by plaintiff from order, interlocutory judgment and final judgment sustaining defendant’s demurrer to the complaint.

1Concurrence 1

Freedman, J. (concurring).

This action is brought by the plaintiff as assignee of the collateral which the maker of a usurious note (also assigned) gave with the note, to procure a. delivery of the note and of the collateral to himself upon payment of the amount that was advanced on the note and the collateral by the present holder. The collateral consists of 5700 shares of the capital stock of the Walnut Grove Water Storage Company.

The complaint seeks equitable relief, and the joint demurrer of the present defendants is upon the ground that the complaint upon its face does not state facts…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Truax.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schermerhorn v. . TalmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
  2. Wheelock v. . LeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  3. Boughton v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1853

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API