Legal Opinion

Contour Spa at the Hard Rock, Inc. v. Seminole Tribe of Florida

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided August 30, 2012No. 11-11997PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARCUS, Circuit Judge:

This case arises out of a leasing agreement between Contour Spa (“Contour”) and the Seminole Tribe of Florida (“the Tribe”) that turned sour. Contour appeals from a district court order dismissing its Amended Complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction on account of the Tribe’s sovereign immunity. Contour offers three reasons to avoid immunity: first, and most basic, Contour claims that the Tribe’s removal of this case to federal court constitutes a voluntary waiver of the Tribe’s immunity, relying on the Supreme Court’s Eleventh Amendment case of Lapides v. Bd. of…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Lapides v. Board of Regents of Univ. System of Ga.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Verlinden B. v. v. Central Bank of NigeriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Katie Lowery v. Honeywell International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State of Alabama v. PCI Gaming AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
  2. Bodi v. Shingle Springs Band of Miwok IndiansCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  3. Outsource Services Management, LLC v. Nooksack Business Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  4. John D. King v. United States GovernmentCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
  5. Alabama v. PCI Gaming AuthorityDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2014

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API