Legal Opinion

Davis v. Lampert Agency, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 2, 1968PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBotein, P. J.

For a payment to him of $400 plaintiff, a photographer, made an oral lease to defendant of a photographic transparency, which defendant agreed to return “ in the condition that it was leased.” Defendant is an advertising agency and not engaged in the business of photography. For the purpose of having an enlarged print made, defendant sent the transparency to K & L Color Service Incorporated, which lost it in some unknown manner. Defendant’s consequent failure-to return the transparency to plaintiff led to the present action for damages, in which plaintiff has been granted summary judgment.

The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stewart v. . StoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Castorina v. RosenNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. Young v. . LearyNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Ames v. BeldenNew York Supreme Court · 1854
  5. Hyland v. PaulNew York Supreme Court · 1860

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Maisel v. Gruner & Jahr USA, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  2. Central School District No. 3 v. InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API