Legal Opinion · Concurrence

People v. Stiglin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 2, 1933Published

1Concurrence

Sherman, J. (concurring).

A careful examination of the record here leads to the conclusion that the finding of the jury was against the credible evidence, and, in addition, I hold that the defendant was not accorded a fair trial.

The proof of perjury committed in the Magistrate’s Court rests entirely upon the testimony of two prostitutes who, with light regard for their oath, have erred in their testimony in so many respects as to render their evidence utterly unworthy of belief, and of one Acuna, an infamous self-confessed criminal and stool pigeon, who did not claim to have ever done an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Bolte v. Third Avenue RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  3. Trupin v. New York City Interborough Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API