Legal Opinion

Caplinger v. Rahman

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 14, 2017No. SD 34820PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDaniel E. Scott, J.

A medical malpractice plaintiff must obtain an opinion of merit from a “legally qualified health care provider,” then file timely notice thereof by affidavit, all in accordance with § 538.225 procedure.1 The statute offers an opportunity to overcome opinion deficiencies (subsection 7), but the notice requirement (subsection 6) is strictly construed. Unless a compliant *329affidavit is timely filed, the case must be dismissed without prejudice. See, e.g., Lang v. Goldsworthy, 470 S.W.3d 748 (Mo. banc 2015); Mayes v. Saint Luke’s Hosp., 430 S.W.3d 260 (Mo. banc 2014); Austin v. Schiro, 466 S.W.3d…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wanda Mayes v. Saint Luke's Hospital of Kansas City, (Consolidated with)Wanda Mayes v. Saint Luke's Hospital of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  2. Wollard v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  3. Spradling v. SSM Health Care St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010
  4. Paul M. Lang and Allison M. Boyer v. Dr. Patrick GoldsworthySupreme Court of Missouri · 2015
  5. Milton Young v. Boone Electric CooperativeMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. American Civil Liberties Union of Missouri and Sara E. Baker v. John R. AshcroftMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. State ex rel. Lavender Farms, LLC v. AshcroftMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Ferder v. ScottMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Brandon Graham v. CIOX Health, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
  5. Garrett Loomis v. Scott Bowers and Lea BookerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API