Legal Opinion

In Re Beckstrom

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 13, 2008No. A08A1557PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bernes, Judge.

Attorney Ron Beckstrom was found in criminal contempt after he failed to appear in court when his client’s case was called for trial. On appeal, Beckstrom contends that his contempt conviction should be reversed because (1) he did not receive timely notice of the trial date, and (2) the letters and telephone call from the trial judge directing him to appear at trial were not orders that could be enforced in a contempt proceeding. We disagree and affirm.

On appeal of a criminal contempt conviction the appropriate standard of appellate review is whether, after viewing the evidence…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Maness v. MeyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. In Re IrvinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  3. Bo Fancy Productions, Inc. v. Rabun County Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  4. Britt v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
  5. In Re BookerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Fields v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  2. In re DillonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
  3. In re PattersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
  4. Brenda Tatelman v. Sara C. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2026
  5. In Re Amy HayesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2025

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API