Hamilton v. Salt Lake County Sewerage Improvement District No. 1
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HENRIOD, Chief Justice.
Appeal from a judgment voiding a sewer bond election. Affirmed.
The sewer district raised two points on appeal: 1) that the mandatory provisions of the statute with respect to the bond election became directory only, after the election, and 2) that the protestants here did not demonstrate that there were sufficient illegal votes to alter the result.
We cannot agree with the first point on appeal, under the facts of this particular case, although as a general proposition, the point might be well taken in a case, if departure from statutory interdiction is quite…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re State in the Interest of WoodwardUtah Supreme Court · 1963
- North Salt Lake v. ST. JOSEPH WATER AND IRR. CO.Utah Supreme Court · 1950
- Tygesen v. Magna Water CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1962
- Rasmussen v. DavisUtah Supreme Court · 1953
3Cited by28 opinions
- Bangerter v. PoultonUtah Supreme Court · 1983
- Simpson v. General Motors CorporationUtah Supreme Court · 1970
- Clark v. SheltonUtah Supreme Court · 1978
- Bartholomew v. BartholomewUtah Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. TrittUtah Supreme Court · 1970
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.