Legal Opinion

Teachenor v. Tibbals

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 1906No. 1742PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Salt Lake County; M. L. Bitcbie, Judge. Action taken by David W. Teacbenor against William H. Tibbals. Erom a judgment dismissing tbe complaint, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBartch, C. J.

Tbis is an action upon contract to recover $318.75. It appears that on June 12, 1896, plaintiff being then tbe owner of ' an undivided one-fourtb interest of tbe Liberal Lode mining claim, conveyed bis interest therein to Tbomas Ma-*11rioneaux, for a consideration of $1,250, of which $400 were paid in cash. As to the balance, $850, the vendee, on the same day, made a written agreement with the vendor, which, so far as material here, reads as follows: “It is agreed that said first party [Marioneaux] will pay to the second party the additional sum of $850 out of the first net profits which may be…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wolf v. MarshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Newcomb v. BrackettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1819
  3. James v. . BurchellNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  4. McIntyre v. Ajax Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Johnston v. SchenckUtah Supreme Court · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Marvin v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  2. Thatcher v. DarrWyoming Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Householder v. NispelNebraska Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Riley v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. Collins v. Atlantic Oil Producing Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API