Legal Opinion

Lester v. Luttrell

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 5, 1962No. 39622PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bkll, Judge.

When an attachment is returnable to the superior or county court, the plaintiff shall file his declaration at the first term. Code § 8-601. It is undisputed that no declaration was filed in this case after the attachment. However, the plaintiff contends that his petition for attachment was equivalent to a declaration, and even though it was defective, the defect was amendable and the judgment cured the defect. Code § 110-702.

In Mehring v. Charles, 58 Ga. 377, the Supreme Court held that the seizure of the defendant’s property by process of attachment will give the court…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Heard v. National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  2. Smith v. Jacksonville Oil Mill Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  3. Wilson v. Stricker & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1881
  4. Worley Bros. Granite Co. v. HaskinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  5. Kolb v. CheneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1879

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kazakos v. SoteresCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. LuttrellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  3. Shelton v. Stone & Sons Plumbing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API