Legal Opinion

Sanborn v. Elmore Milling Company

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 21, 1957PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTapley, J.

On exceptions. Plaintiff seeks to recover damages from the defendant for the loss of some turkeys by death and the retarded growth of other turkeys occasioned, as he says, by improper feed furnished by the defendant. It is claimed that the feed purchased from the defendant and fed to the birds contained a sulfa quinoxaline content in an amount over that specified and guaranteed by the defendant, which so adversely affected the birds as to cause death of some and retard the growth of others.

The case was tried before a jury in the Superior Court, within and for the County of Cumberland. After…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1913
  2. Barrett v. GreenallSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1942
  3. Johnson v. Portland Terminal Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1932
  4. Coleman v. LordSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1902
  5. Bennett v. TalbotSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1897

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. George Lee Mims, Sr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  2. Kittery Electric Light Co. v. Assessors of KitterySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1966
  3. Valente v. Commercial Insurance Co. of Newark, NJSupreme Court of Vermont · 1967
  4. Blanchard v. BassSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1958
  5. F. X. Bilodeau Realty, Inc. v. Lewiston Urban Renewal AuthoritySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API