Canfield v. Canfield
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and matter remitted to Chautauqua County Family Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: Family Court erred in dismissing as untimely respondent’s objections to the order of the Hearing Examiner. Pursuant to Family Court Act § 439 (e), respondent had 30 days from the entry of the order to file his objections. Service with notice of entry is required to commence the running of that period (see, Matter of Stone v Schlegal, 132 Mise 2d 808, 809; see generally, Cultural Ctr. Commn. v Kokoritsis, 103 AD2d…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Cultural Center Commission v. KokoritsisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ogborn v. HiltsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Commissioner of Social Services ex rel. Obremski v. DietrichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Corcoran v. StuartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Geary v. BreenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Oneida County Department of Social Services ex rel. Hurd v. HurdAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.